Recently in Cloud Applications Category

In the first quarter of 2010, we created a 4-phased Cloud Storage Maturity Model which still makes complete sense in 2012. The market is finding the way forward, following the blueprint we described almost to a T.

With our cloud storage maturity model in mind, here are some thoughts on the trends we're seeing this year. What we're describing is the State of Cloud Storage in 2012:

• The rise of a new application delivery architecture

We think this year everyone will figure out that cloud storage is not just cheap storage via the web, but the delivery of a new application architecture, whereby applications are fully contained on a variety of devices (smartphones, tablets and PCs) and the backend is a cloud data store with REST APIs. 

• The consumerization of everything

Enterprises as well as large institutions will seek alternatives to allowing their employees to use consumer tools like DropBox as well as alternatives to tools like box that still store data (albeit encrypted) in a public cloud (i.e. Amazon S3). This trend, aptly named the "consumerization of IT" is creating many alternatives that provide more security, and integration with key corporate support tools.  Cloud Storage is a key enabler of the consumer tools that have found favor with early and wide adoption, so look for the successful entrants with enterprise class security to be based on cloud technologies, and stored behind private firewalls so that the solutions will be as attractive to end users as the consumer tools, but that IT can control the security of their confidential corporate data and compliance initiatives.

• Disintermediation of services
  

The disintermediation of telcos and device manufacturers will continue, with the most cogent example being Apple delivering text messaging "off network" via iCloud.   Already, with devices using WiFi, from multiple suppliers, a storage cloud is a key enabler of these services.

• Manageability

Storage cloud manageability will grow as a requirement as the storage clouds get larger.  Storage clouds will become a delivery vehicle for highly complex management schemes focused on storage tiering. Let's talk ITIL in the Cloud.

Ladies and gentlemen, fellow citizens of the Cloud, the enterprise is ready for cloud storage. Let us know what you think.

Let's discuss the rapid adoption of "App Stores", and the types of applications that are being enabled for a variety of devices, primarily tablets and smartphones. While these applications are each written to deliver unique capabilities and take advantage of the platform they are designed for, as well as being written for different platforms (for example, Android apps are developed in JAVA, Apple IOS apps in Objective C) they share a common enabling technology: REST API access to a storage cloud.  

This approach is rapidly enabling new applications, which differ from older approaches like client server, virtual desktop and Web browser enabled applications in very important ways.  The backend infrastructure ( a REST API storage cloud) is a simple, massively scalable server-based solution, that can reside within the enterprise data center (a private cloud), or at an IT Service Provider (either a hosted private cloud or a public cloud). It is easy to scale, easy to manage, and by providing a consistent storage backend, it allows developers to focus on their applications and associated business logic versus worrying about the backend architecture. This provides for a "separation of concerns" in that Web, Windows, MAC, Android or IOS applications can be substantially different, but they all use the same REST API of the storage cloud they depend on. As your application use and portfolio grows, you simply scale the storage cloud, versus having to make significant changes to the server infrastructure, as is the case with client server, virtual desktop or Web browser enabled applications.

The disruptive wave is coming fast, and you will see it bringing new capabilities and applications for that large screen in your automobile (watch for car makers offering applications in App Stores), a touch screen on your refrigerator, as well as enterprise applications that will support tablets and smart phones.  Think about estimating at a job site with an application on a tablet, or estimating a property insurance damage claim with a tablet, the application is on the tablet, and the data could reside in multiple storage clouds.

Expect to see more enterprise applications taking advantage of this low cost, and easy way to deliver the kind of applications their employees and partners need.

There are multiple productive and desirable use cases for cloud storage for the enterprise.  This spans many use cases, including specialized applications that use programmable API cloud storage, file server replacement solutions, backup and archive solutions and what we call "Personal Cloud Storage."  (Personal Cloud Storage, or PCS, is the use of PC, tablet, mobile clients and web browsers by an individual to access a pool of storage.)  As opposed to a long discussion about all these, let's focus for a moment on the phenomena of the "consumerization" of IT and what if really means in the context of enterprise IT, and specifically as it relates to PCs.

The enterprise continues to register significant concerns about using public, multi-tenant storage offerings, primarily because of the "triple threat" of risk:  unauthorized access, data loss, and the opportunity for enforced access by government institutions.  In addition to the triple threat, employees are beginning to expect the enterprise IT organization to be as responsive to their needs as they know public storage service providers can and will be.  This includes easy and immediate provisioning of whatever amount of storage is required, on a pay as you go basis, at a fair price, on all your devices, and what is now represented as the consumerization of IT.

So, what's the appropriate response for the enterprise IT organization?  I believe there are three responses forming up:  

1)    We can't stop it, so let's publish acceptable usage policies and hope for the best;
2)    Just say no - you cannot do that - and then try to control it; and,
3)    Obtain an alternative that is better controlled and delivered by a trusted service provider as a "private" or "hybrid" cloud solution for your institutions use, and/or implement an in-house solution.

At Mezeo, we saw this coming and we strongly believe that the third option listed above is the appropriate response.  It recognizes the need for self service provisioning of required storage solutions along with multiple access points, but puts in place appropriate controls to avoid the triple threat.  

After looking at this snippet I decided to read the full paper from Appirio.  It actually says that 68% of "cloud adopters" expect to have the majority of their data and applications in the cloud within three years. 

What we are not told is the actual % of cloud adopters amongst medium and large enterprises. So, 68% of some subset of medium and large enterprises are racing to the cloud - not bad - but not the marketplace as a whole either.

Since "cloud adopters" are also early adopters, it comes as no surprise that they are rapidly moving to the cloud and will be done in three years.  They are also doing it because they intuitively understand that the cloud is the right thing to do, and they know that even if it is at best a break even proposition today, they will be the first to arrive at the true benefits.  Or, perhaps, they are solving something more problematic than others may be enduring, like poorly designed home grown applications, legacy application that are ready to cycle out, lack of capital for data center expansion, or any other of the many drivers that sends you to the cloud for a solution.

 Also, cloud adoption is slowed primarily by security concerns, and two concurrent activities are solving this problem on a daily basis.  One, IT organizations are winding up their early evaluations and figuring out what they can immediately live with in a cloud solution.  Second, improved security solutions are racing to market to solve these concerns associated with cloud based solutions, so more and more cloud capabilities are now deemed secure.  This trend will continue until security is no longer the blanket excuse for not becoming cloudy, and instead wide spread adoption will be governed by capacity, conversion capability, business case process and analysis, and the orderly march to the next generation of computing infrastructure.

I have a golden rule of IT technology adoption:  It always happens, and it always happens slower than the industry pundits suggest.  Cloud computing is no different.  As a matter of fact, it is very supportive of my golden rule of IT Technology, and is behaving in the usual, predictable fashion. Every time someone tries to convince me otherwise, I think about IBM, the mainframe, and the many occasions it was pronounced dead.  I went to that funeral twenty years ago and it is still growing strong.  How about the AS/400? Same story.  

Now is an exciting time to be in information technology.  What excites me about cloud computing is that it is an approach to computing service delivery that is driving significant technology investment and the promise of significant returns.  And, it is being delivered in the crucible of the open market, not by government edict, or with central planning, but with the chaos and creative destruction that only capitalism can provide.

Dan Decasper co-founded Cirtas with the vision of enabling the enterprise to utilize cloud storage as if it were a local array.

CloudStorageStrategy.com asked him a few questions about "Cloud Storage Controllers" and what the technology means for the enterprise. 

Note: Cirtas is a Mezeo Ready Solution Partner.

What was the original idea behind Cirtas?
Cirtas' co-founders previously built a WAN optimization company that was acquired by Citrix.  Together, they saw the coming of the cloud and recognized that broad scale adoption of cloud storage would require a "catalyst" technology to make the experience seamless and high performing.  They had the expertise to develop such technology and founded Cirtas to address the market need.

What is a Cloud Storage Controller?
A Cloud Storage Controller (CSC) is analogous to the array controllers found in enterprise storage systems, except instead of providing data protection, security, advanced virtualization features, and performance for an array of locally attached disk drives, a Cloud Storage Controller provides these capabilities on top of public cloud storage.  The net result is that public cloud storage can be utilized by the enterprise as if it were a local storage array - quickly, easily and for any application.

Who uses them Cloud Storage Controllers? Why do they need them?
Cloud Storage Controllers are used by mid-to-large enterprise - typically organizations with 10TB to several petabytes of data that are looking to reduce their overall cost of storage and simplify their storage environment.

These types of customers need Cloud Storage Controllers because leveraging public cloud storage services is simply not feasible without them.  The sheer number of applications running in a typical enterprise precludes them from being re-written to cloud APIs, and other concerns such as security and performance must be overcome.  Cloud Storage Controllers address all these concerns in a very robust way, allowing cloud storage to be used like local storage - but with superior economics and simplicity.

What benefits does a CSC offer?
A Cloud Storage Controller offers three main benefits:

1) It creates a seamless and highly robust connection to cloud storage, while requiring no changes to applications running in the data center.  Applications are able to access the cloud using standard block and file access protocols on what appears to be a standard logical volume.  The magic of the Cloud Storage Controller is in presenting a standard storage interface to servers and applications on the SAN, while connecting to the cloud over the WAN, and requiring nothing of the user to make this happen.

2) It accelerates the performance of applications using cloud storage through advanced WAN acceleration techniques including caching, deduplication, compression, and protocol optimization.  These techniques make cloud storage perform like local storage - even over relatively limited Internet connections (e.g. a DS3 at 45Mbps).  Furthermore, these same techniques help customers reduce their cloud storage service fees (and total cost of ownership) since they are not storing as much data in the cloud or moving as much data back and forth to it.

3) The Cloud Storage Controller provides the same features and capabilities expected of local storage arrays, such as thin provisioning, automated storage tiering, volume management, snapshots, and more.  These capabilities enhance the native functionality of the cloud, making it easier to use and providing superior data protection capabilities.

What applications/data sets make sense for the cloud?
Any Tier 2 or Tier 3 application or data set makes sense for the cloud through a Cloud Storage Controller.  The applications that don't yet make sense are highly mission critical or performance sensitive applications like large databases, ERP systems, and data warehousing.  Applications that make perfect sense are home directories, unstructured content storage, SAN offload, archiving, backup/tape replacement, and large-scale data collection (e.g. log storage)

What are your impressions of the cloud storage market today, and where it's going?  
It's an exciting time to be in the cloud storage market.  There's so much potential and things are just getting going.  Cloud storage has been very successful for web applications, and in conjunction with cloud computing.  However, it hasn't yet transcended into a tool for the mainstream enterprise.  At Cirtas we've got an opportunity to change that and we're seeing tremendous traction.  When we started two years ago, IT managers were aware of the cloud, but were fairly uneducated about it.  Today there are increasing numbers of cloud storage initiatives being driven from the CIO level, along with much more recognition of the technology among the media and analyst community as a potential game changer.  So these days it's much easier to engage with customers.  Keep an eye on the statistics published by cloud storage providers - you'll be amazed at the growth rates you see them achieve.

Here’s the audio of my interview with Network World:

In essence, I cover the points I made in this blog post on OpenStack >>

Just read David Linthicum's post, A way out of the private cloud dead end. 

We discussed the advent of hybrid cloud in our earlier post on a maturity model for cloud storage. While it is important that technology providers are beginning to grapple with the requirements to move seamlessly from a private cloud to a public cloud, the assumption here is that the workload owner is willing to utilize a public cloud multi-tenant solution for their workload.  I'm not sure we're there yet.

It is unclear to me that the marketplace and especially the higher end enterprises  (who retain and own significant IT resources and data centers) are yet willing to embrace public multi-tenant clouds.  I know they'll eventually do so as the security solutions and their early experiences improve confidence in the public cloud.  Certainly there are non proprietary workloads that will be used for the earliest testing.  However, this is still a very nascent market, and you should expect that we have several years of work ahead of us to build out a fully functioning hybrid model that provides appropriate security and control.

I strongly agree that the level of activity is reminiscent of the late nineties.  The majors are trying to build out their cloud stacks, and they are doing that with internal development and by buying smaller companies focused on individual layers of the stack, or even a feature on the layer.  I looked at some "gee whiz" numbers from various research organizations, and saw that IDC postulates that more than one third of all digital information created on an annual basis will reside in, or at least pass through, the cloud at some point in its life cycle. 

Amazing!

On July 19, 2010, Rackspace led the announcement of OpenStack, with a goal of creating an open source cloud software solution for use on industry-standard hardware.  The initial releases contemplate solutions for both cloud compute and object storage.  While these are the first two releases, they are separate offerings.  Remember, cloud storage is not just the storage target for cloud computing, it is one potential storage target for cloud computing, and is in and of itself a stand alone cloud offering of programmable storage.

Now, I have purposely used a term from the clothing industry, "off the rack", to spend a moment looking at a framework for evaluating the opportunities this may present.  With dress shirts, you can buy off the rack, semi custom, or custom, each with a unique value proposition based on fit, choice and cost.   Interestingly enough, this may be a good lens through which to consider the possibilities of OpenStack, and in particular, OpenStack Object Storage.

Rackspace has made no secret of its motivations for leading this initiative, and its desire to focus on "fanatical" service as it's key differentiator versus the fundamental technology on which the service is based.  Fair enough, and so the question becomes, is the rapidly emerging and immature cloud marketplace already "mature" enough to seek homeostasis?  (Homeostasis is the property of a system, either open or closed, that regulates its internal environment and tends to maintain a stable, constant condition.)  Have enough models and innovations, from startups, academia, open source movements and large tech companies, been tested in the marketplace to the extent that we can already race to the common denominator?  Perhaps now is a good time to start, as long as you are willing to acknowledge that the desired results are a good ways off.

Before we jump off into "Off the Rack" software, a quick look back at open source is helpful.  For more reading on the open source software industry a good introduction is The Cathedral and the Bazaar. Six things are particularly interesting: 

1. An open source alternative can emerge as a follow on to a successful commercial technology and can become pervasive versus the commercial offerings it succeeded (LINUX versus UNIX is the reference case here).
   
2. A second result of this approach can also end up with a big success, although in more of a niche than a pervasive replace for the earlier commercial offerings (MySQL versus Oracle, IBM and Microsoft in the relational data base space).  
   
3. An open source effort can also emerge earlier in a technology cycle and come of age as a pervasive solution (Apache Web Server comes to mind here).
   
4. Open source generally requires very careful cultivation of the community of developers, with active interest by academia (and partnering with NASA is part of the formula here).  Commercially sponsored open source efforts are becoming more common, although it as of yet has not been proven as the typical "breeding ground" for most great open source successes.  Eucalyptus, with its roots at University of California Santa Barbara, seems to be a more traditional route.
   
5. Open source is not necessarily reflective of rapid commercial opportunities for success.  Eucalyptus is obviously beginning to maneuver towards a repeat of the commercialization model.  OpenStack is taking the approach most favored by other open source successes like Apache.  A couple of good reads here are this article from BusinessWeek and this. See also Derrick Harris' post over at GigaOm.
   
6. There are also hundreds of thousands of open source projects that had mixed success or languished altogether. A quick look at  SourceForge (an open source project hosting site) shows nearly a quarter million hosted projects. How many of these have languished or had little impact on the market.
   

So, the first issue is that there will exist for some time to come a real question as to the adoption potential of OpenStack.   I believe that adoption is driven by applicability to need.  In a moment we will address a serious issue which OpenStack Object Storage must overcome to be successful, at best, and at worst, will confine it to a niche market.  My views are very much directed at the Object Storage offering, versus the compute offering, which I believe exists in a different space and as a different type of solution.  With this backdrop, let's have a look at the cloud storage marketplace today, and use the analogy of off the rack, semi custom and custom:

• Off the Rack:  implement as is, one size fits all, each with unique approaches for performance, scalability, bit integrity, may or may not provide geo services.
• Semi Custom:  Select from storage types (DAS, SAN, NAS, JBOD), shared or distributed file systems and object systems, mix and match storage for different SLA and cost/usage patterns on the same infrastructure, multiple APIs, meta data and catalog abstracted from storage layer, geo services.
• Custom:  Generally a service only offering and not available as deployable infrastructure, specifics will vary widely based on service provider offering strategy.
  

Infrastructure	Type	Comments
Eucalyptus	Off the Rack	Limited S3 APIs
OpenStack	Off the Rack	CloudFiles APIs
Scality	Off the Rack	S3 APIs
Mezeo	Semi Custom	Mezeo Cloud Storage Platform API and Interoperability API
NetApp	Off the Rack	Bycast APIs, NetApp storage
EMC Atmos	Off the Rack	Atmos ReST APIs, EMC storage
Service	Type	Comments
Amazon S3	Custom	S3 APIs
Microsoft Azure	Custom	Windows centric
Rackspace	Off the Rack	Is the basis for OpenStack
Nirvanix	Custom	SOAP APIs, multi node
Google	Custom	Offers S3 APIs
AT&T Synaptic	Off the Rack	Based on EMC Atmos
OpSource, SoftLayer, Layered Tech and others	Custom	Based on Mezeo

As you can see from the summary above, there exist as many views of what constitutes either a cloud storage service or a desirable cloud storage deployable infrastructure as there are service providers and vendors.  Note that a semi custom infrastructure results in a "custom" service as implemented.  "Off the rack" results in very similar services by those who utilize the same infrastructure unless they make their own major additions.  Any offering can be differentiated by service, and the degree and quality of service is critical to customer satisfaction and plays a strong role in value creation.

The OpenStack announcement as it regards Object Store and its approach to cloud storage seems to view cloud storage infrastructure as highly akin to an operating system (or at least a "hypervisor") and more similar to a selection of LINUX or Windows than that of an application or middleware layer.  While I agree that cloud compute is very close to this model, cloud storage is a service oriented architecture, with programmability for new applications that can tolerate Internet latency because of Web Services (like ReST APIs). The industry constantly overlooks this key point as it is consumed with the low cost, pay for use and thin provisioning capabilities of this storage tier.  Solutions for thin provisioning and low cost have been available far longer than cloud storage. Further, pay for use is more of a business decision than a technology. 

In the earliest days of cloud storage, there existed initial confusion that cloud storage was defined by cost, scalability, pay for use, and thin provisioning only and not programmable access (usually via ReST APIs).  ParaScale paid a huge price for not understanding that cloud storage requires Web services (like ReST API) access.  Now, with OpenStack Object Store, we see a follow on case of this same perspective, but with basic APIs for Put, Get and List.   Yes, it provides for Internet access via ReST APIs, but the focus continues to be primarily cost based versus new application enablement based.  It could be argued that the open source approach will provide for the appropriate additions of "advanced services" to be added.  However, even the use of the platform by NASA is more focused on cost of storage than on advanced functionality because NASA stores much more data than almost any institution or enterprise in the world.

I think Savio Rodrigues states this view very well in his post:

"Select products based on business needs, not license alone: It's also interesting to note that very few enterprises are in NASA's position with regards to size of IT investment and skills in-house. While NASA engineers were ready and willing to contribute new features into the Eucalyptus open source community, few companies have the skills or governance to consider allowing their developers to contribute to open source projects.  Summary trend number 7 from the 2010 Eclipse survey results highlighted this issue.

To suggest that NASA's buying or IT decision making patterns represents much more than the top 1 percent of IT buyers would be a stretch."

The overwhelming majority of enterprises would rather pay a vendor to deliver, maintain, support and enhance their private cloud software infrastructure than place that burden on internal IT staff. Whether the enterprise is paying for a closed source commercial product, a commercial product based on an open core product, or a subscription to an open source product, the product selection decision will be made based on business requirements much broader than 'is the product open source or not?' "

Keep in mind that cloud storage is a stand alone service associated with application delivery over the Internet and also associated with low cost, pay for use, scalable storage resources.  Social media applications and many Web based applications exploit these capabilities; for example publishing a file to a URL and significant tagging of files.

This view of cloud storage as nothing more than cost and volume-based ignores its extraordinary importance as a service-oriented architecture for new application enablement.  I believe both views are equally important and need to be equally served.  Will OpenStack, with its pervasive cost focus, be able to drive its community to this additional view of needed contributions of advanced services for cloud storage?  Lydia Leong of Gartner Group provides an interesting view of the open source community issues associated with this in her post:

"At the same time, open sourcing is not necessarily a way to software success. Rackspace has a whole host of new challenges that it will have to meet. First, it must ensure that the roadmap of the new project aligns sufficiently with its own needs, since it has decided that it will use the project's public codebase for its own service. Second, it now has to manage and just as importantly, lead, an open-source community, getting useful commits from outside contributors and managing the commit process. (Rackspace and NASA have formed a board for governance of the project, on which they have multiple seats but are in the minority.) Third, as with all such things, there are potential code-quality issues, the impact of which become significantly magnified when running operations at massive scale."

One last comment on this business of vendor lock in and cloud storage APIs (another focus of the OpenStack announcement).  I would submit that while a specific set of APIs has the potential to create vendor lock in, this is a much smaller problem than what is experienced in other technologies.  If you are really worried about it, you probably have never actually written a ReST API call.  It is written in many languages, and we have seen cases where applications that run on S3 run unchanged on Mezeo.  Others need very minor modifications, and still others are excited to take advantage of some of the unique Mezeo services.  It just is not a problem, and this is much more related to FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt) and marketing zealotry than it is associated with technological reality.  The APIs of choice will shake out, and it is far too early to say if it will be S3, OpenStack, CDMI or a combination of all of these, and others, as yet unforeseen. 

At Mezeo, we have never believed there will be one winner, and instead focused on architecture to enable easy and effective delivery of whichever APIs stand the test of time. The Mezeo Cloud Storage Platform API enables advanced services and programmatic access to Mezeo enabled storage clouds.   The Mezeo Interoperability API enables seamless interoperability of applications developed for Amazon S3, Google and Eucalyptus based storage clouds.

The interesting view that seems to be missing here is that marketplace competition by service providers already serves to drive down the price of cloud storage, so a commoditized stack embraced by most is unlikely to yield extraordinary incremental savings.  At the same time, while the competitive market conspires to drive cloud storage costs ever lower, the need to differentiate, and deliver solutions as well as a programmable storage to enable multiple new and exciting types of applications will rapidly replace the pure cost and scale focus of current cloud storage offerings.  Sometimes, the "new" application is simply enabling it in the cloud, to produce the same result at a lower cost!  This requires significant cloud storage functionality in order to make this easy and productive.  Amazon continues to prove this with their many additions and capabilities which differentiate their service.  Mezeo sees much the same view on the part of our customers.  The focus is on what cloud storage can do, what problems will it solve, what business opportunities does it create, what new applications can it enable and all of these views assume it will be competitively priced.

Cloud storage represents significant opportunities for institutions, the enterprise (see my recent post on the business case for enterprise cloud storage) and for the IT service provider.  Cloud storage is substantially different from cloud compute, and requires that you understand this difference in order to effectively evaluate the impact of this announcement, as well as your next steps.

Cloud Storage Strategy interviewed Gladinet co-founder Jerry Huang on cloud desktops, cloud gateways, and his company's business model. 

[NOTE: Gladinet is a customer of Mezeo Software.]

Cloud Storage Strategy recently interviewed Layered Tech CEO Jack Finlayson on the economic benefits of cloud computing, the downturn, and virtual private data centers for the enterprise. 

NOTE: Layered Tech is a customer of Mezeo Software, the underwriter of this blog. 

Layered Tech has obviously focused on building a trusted infrastructure for customers.  How do you sustain that trust level?

As customer requirements and expectations continue to change, we've evolved in order to handle more detailed and complex requirements. We continually evaluate every aspect of our IT infrastructure and network to ensure we have the appropriate resiliencies and protections in place. We also take pride in our culture of continuous improvement in all aspects of customer service; it's the best way we can support our customers.

This is why we're here - to manage our customers' infrastructure so they can concentrate on their business.  From the beginning, it's all about providing superior levels of customer support. When we begin a new customer relationship, we learn the customer's specific business needs and provide counsel on the best infrastructure solution to best support those needs and meet overall business goals. 

This is how we've built our reputation as a trusted provider with our customers around the globe, and our customers know they can count on Layered Tech for the highest quality infrastructure solutions and service.  With seven top tier data centers on three continents, we deliver secure, scalable and ultra-reliable solutions for IT infrastructure that support even the most complex enterprise requirements. 

We also maintain relationships with leading technology partners and keep up with our extensive certifications to ensure that we have the resources and expertise to deliver the best in managed dedicated hosting, cloud computing services and cloud-based storage.

Has the economic downturn helped accelerate the migration to cloud based data centers? 

Absolutely. The economic downturn has forced almost everyone to do more with less, which is why more companies are turning to cloud computing. 

Increased scalability and flexibility and a pay-per-use model creates a more cost-effective and agile infrastructure solution.  Customers leveraging Layered Tech's cloud computing and virtualization solutions reduce capital and operating expenses while enabling IT staff to focus on higher priority business needs rather than their infrastructure. 

Customers can also choose from a range of support options from Layered Tech's tiered managed services, ranging from the highest root-level access down to the lowest self-managed option with varying levels in between.  It's all about helping them to be flexible and do more with less.

Can you explain what the Virtual Private Data Centers (VPDC) platform service is?  Is this a flavor of the cloud computing model that people have been talking about?

Sure. We pioneered Virtual Private Data Centers - or VPDCs - which offer enterprise-class security, choice and flexibility.  It's a hybrid approach that gives customers dedicated, unshared resources in their off-premise cloud infrastructure rather than placing their data into purely public clouds.  VPDC platforms and private clouds are becoming popular cloud computing approaches for enterprises because they provide more control and security than public cloud offerings.

Whether it's an "internal private cloud" created and maintained by the enterprise's IT staff and housed within its onsite data center, or it's an "external private cloud," where the enterprise engages with a third-party hosting provider like Layered Tech to develop and operate a private cloud within one or more of the hosting company's data centers, enterprises want to have their own cloud infrastructure.  In other words, we believe that enterprises will not want clouds with shared resources, like those that exist in purely public cloud environments.

So, with the VPDC, customers gain the on-demand scalability of the cloud with all the reliability and security of dedicated servers.  The integrated virtualization platform also offers levels of managed services, security and flexibility via a proprietary API that were previously unavailable in an integrated offering. 


We created a maturity model for cloud storage just a few weeks ago. Can you tell us if it matches with your experience in the industries you serve?

Yes, it does. We believe that 2010 will be the first meaningful stage of cloud computing's rocket-ride of growth and enterprise usage, and it's all fueled by the need for further operational and financial improvement.  We've found that enterprises are seeking cloud computing benefits such as lower costs, higher productivity, greater speed to market, and near-instantaneous scalability of computing resources. 

It's important to note that CIOs now have an easier time showing their CEOs and CFOs the value of migrating to cloud computing and virtualized environments, especially considering the competitive advantages they create. The investment required to migrate to the cloud alone generates immediate short-term value, while also delivering long-term upside.  

Like your cloud storage maturity model, we think that custom migration plans and hybrid approaches to cloud computing also will be an emerging trend in 2010.  Enterprises will evaluate business drivers and align technology solutions to their corporate needs more closely than ever before.  The result will be the growing adoption of a hybrid approach, where a portion of the IT infrastructure stays in the physical, dedicated server world, while the remainder migrates into the cloud.

Finally, can you tell our readers about LT Depot, your cloud storage solution?

As you know, we just launched our new cloud storage solution called LT Depot, which is powered by the Mezeo™ Cloud Storage Platform.

LT Depot allows you to create and select scalable, reliable, and secure storage for your application and service needs. If you need storage for images, videos or critical documents without significant capital expense, LT Depot is your answer.

Not only is LT Depot designed as a robust and reliable storage avenue, it provides customers the extended advantages of sharing and collaboration. This provides features such as access, create, manage, and edit documents and files no matter where your users reside -- even from their mobile devices. Whether your team exists in one office, or multi-site locations around the world, stay connected and work together seamlessly and efficiently.